Amol @ Amar Abhiman Takik And ORS. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS Date: 2022.10.07 10:47:54 +0530 79-wp.3131.2021.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3131 OF 2021 Amol @Amar Abhiman Takik and Ors.

...Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

Mr. Rushikesh Kale, for the Petitioners.

Mr. J. P. Yagnik, A.P.P for the Respondent No.1- State. Mr. Sagar Tambe i/b Mr. Ritesh Thobde, for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & S. M. MODAK, JJ.

DATE : 4th OCTOBER 2022 P.C. :

1.

After arguing for some time, when the Court was not inclined to entertain the petition, learned counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to file an appropriate application seeking the petitioners discharge from the said case, if till date charge has not been framed in the said case. 2.

Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

N. S. Chitnis 1/2

79-wp.3131.2021.doc 3.

If an application for discharge is preferred by the petitioners (if charge is not framed), the learned Judge to decide the same, on its own merits, in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the withdrawal of the aforesaid petition.

4.

Petition is accordingly disposed of.

5.

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

S. M. MODAK, J.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

N. S. Chitnis 2/2