← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/842/2015anticipatory bail granted

Sunil Manik Lohar v. The State Of Maharashtra

2015-06-29Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Mridula Bhatkar3 pages

Vishal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.842 OF 2015 Sunil Manik Lohar ... Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. Umesh Mankapure, for the Applicant.

Mr. D.B. Adsule, APP for Respondent - State.

Mr. S.M. Kore (API), Mhaswad police station, Pune present.

CORAM:

MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

DATE:

JUNE 29, 2015 P.C.:

.

The application is moved for pre arrest bail as the applicant/accused is apprehending arrest in C.R. No. 26 of 2015 registered with Mhaswad police station, Satara for the offences punishable under Sections 8(k), 20(b) and 2(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS) and under Section 65 of the Maharashtra Liquor Prohibition Act.

2.

The applicants/accused along with his mother and one Laxman are prosecuted for the selling of ganja which was found in total 0.714 gm. The learned counsel for the applicant/accused has submitted 1 / 3

that mother of the applicant/accused was arrested and she has given the information to the police that applicant/accused used to purchase ganja from accused No. 3 Laxman. Now accused Laxman is behind the bars. He submitted that considering the quantity of ganja, the applicant/accused is to be protected. He further submitted that all the details from where ganja is purchased is given by the mother of the applicant/accused and there is no reason for taking custody of the applicant/accused. 3.

The learned prosecutor has opposed the application. He relied on the report and the statements of witnesses and also on the order passed by the trial Judge dated 4th June, 2015 rejecting the application. 4.

Perused the first information report and the police report. The applicant/accused runs a grocery shop along with the co­accused, his mother. The quantity of ganja is less than 1000 gms. i.e. 0.741 gms. Therefore section 27 of NDPS Act will not come in the way of granting pre arrest bail. The quantity of ganja is assessed. So also the source from where the ganja is procured is known to the police. On instructions the learned prosecutor informs the Court that the applicant/accused does not have any antecedents. Hence, I am of the view that pre arrest bail can be granted. 2 / 3

5.

Hence, I grant anticipatory bail as under:

a) In the event of arrest, the applicant/accused be enlarged on bail on furnishing P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/­ (Twenty Thousand) with one or two solvent surety/s in the like amount; b) The applicant/accused shall attend the concerned police station once in a week on every Saturday in between 5.00 pm to 7.00 pm till filing of the charge­sheet.

c) He shall not indulge in any criminal activity. 6.

Anticipatory bail application is disposed of on the above terms. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) 3 / 3