← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2500/2025disposed off

Kondiba Hanmant Godase v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2025-09-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2500 OF 2025 Kondiba Hanmant Godase ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra And Anr.

...Respondents

_______ Mr. Mahindra Deshmukh for Petitioner.

Dr. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the Respondent-State. Ms. Minakshi Vinay Mali LHC, Kurlup Police Station, Sangli, present. _______

CORAM

:

SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE :

12th SEPTEMBER 2025 P.C.

1.

By this Writ Petition, Petitioner is prayed to quash and set aside the order dated 20th March, 2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Islampur, District Sangli, in Criminal Application No.27 of 2024.

2.

It is contention of learned counsel for Petitioner that the learned Sessions Court had allowed the anticipatory bail application of the Petitioner and directed him to attend the concerned Police Station every alternate day. Due to ill health, Petitioner could not attend the Police Station. Thereafter, the Investigation Officer filed application for cancellation of anticipatory bail. The learned Sessions Digitally signed by SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Date:

2025.09.15 16:51:43 +0530 SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR

Judge has cancelled the anticipatory bail by passing impugned order on the ground that the Petitioner failed to comply the conditions imposed in the bail order. Learned counsel for Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner is ready to attend Police Station as directed by this Court. Hence, requested to allow the Petition. 3.

It is contention of learned APP that the offence under Section 420 of IPC and relevant Sections are registered against the Petitioner. He was directed to attend the Police Station every alternate day but he failed to attend the Police Station nor he produce medical papers before the trial Court. The learned Sessions Judge has passed well reasoned order. No interference is required in it. Hence, requested to reject the Petition.

4.

I have heard both the learned counsels. Anticipatory Bail Application of the Petitioner is cancelled due to non compliance of bail conditions. The Petitioner is ready to attend the Police Station as directed by the Sessions Court. Considering this fact, I pass the following order.

ORDER

(i) Writ Petition is allowed;

(ii) The impugned order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Islampur is quashed and set aside.

(iii) In the event of arrest, the Petitioner be enlarged on bail in C.R. No.91 of 2024 registered with Kurlap Police Station, on executing P.R.Bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount.

(iv) The Petitioner shall attend the concerned Police Station once in a month on third Monday of every month between 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. till filing of charge-sheet.

5.

The Writ Petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms and is accordingly disposed off.

6.

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)