Akshay Manik Gore And ANR. v. The State Of Maharashtra

SANDEEP CHITNIS Date: 2021.09.18 15:21:24 +0530 NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS 13-ba.2701.2021.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2701 OF 2021 Akshay Manik Gore and Anr.

...Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Rahul S. Kate, for the Applicants.

Ms. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent - State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE : 16th SEPTEMBER, 2021 (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) P.C. :

1.

Learned A.P.P makes a statement that during the pendency of the aforesaid application, charge-sheet has been filed as against the applicants.

2.

In view of the statement made by learned APP, the learned counsel for the applicants does not press this application and seeks leave to withdraw the same with liberty to file a fresh application for bail, after filing of the charge-sheet, before the Sessions Court. 3.

Application is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

N. S. Chitnis 1/2

13-ba.2701.2021.doc 4.

It is made clear, that the application has not been considered on merits and if an application for regular bail, after filing of the charge sheet is filed, the same shall be considered on its own merits, uninfluenced by the withdrawal of the aforesaid application.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

N. S. Chitnis 2/2