Shri. Sallauddin Ibrahim Shiledar (Decd) Through Lrs. v. State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Digitally signed by BALAJI GOVINDRAO PANCHAL Date:

2022.07.28 17:10:40 +0530 BALAJI GOVINDRAO PANCHAL WRIT PETITION NO.8677 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2590 OF 2016 Shri. Sallauddin Ibrahim Shiledar Since deceased through legal heirs Shri. Dastgir Sallauddin Shiledar Since deceased through legal heirs Smt. Shafiya Dastagir Shiledar & Ors.

..Petitioners

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

..Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2585 OF 2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8677 OF 2016 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.596 OF 2022 Smt. Gulshan Babalaj Shiledar ..Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Shri. Sallauddin Ibrahim Shiledar Since deceased through legal heirs Shri. Dastgir Sallauddin Shiledar Since deceased through legal heirs Smt. Shafiya Dastagir Shiledar & Ors.

..Petitioners

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

..Respondents Mr. Manoj Patil, for the Petitioners.

Smt. V. S. Nimbalkar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4. Mr. V. S. Talkute i/by S. R. Ghanavat, for Respondent No.5.

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 28th JULY, 2022 P.C.

1.

Counsel for the petitioners makes a prayer for deletion of respondent Nos.6 to 17.

2.

Since the prayer is not objected, same stands allowed at the risk and peril of the petitioner. 3.

Amendment be carried out forthwith.

4.

Both the counsels have tendered consent terms which are duly executed by petitioner and respondent No.5. A joint request is made that the petition be disposed of in terms of the consent terms.

5.

As such, the notarized consent terms notarized on 18th July, 2022 tendered during the course of hearing are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. 6.

A joint request made by the parties hereto for disposal of the petition in terms thereof is accepted. 7.

Petitioner No.2 and Power of Attorney holder of respondent No.5 are informed to be present in Court. As such, the petition stands disposed of in terms of the consent terms.

8.

The additions in regard to the boundaries as mentioned in conditions (a) to (d) countersigned by the petitioner are duly recognized by the Power of Attorney holder of respondent No.5. As such, parties are in agreement on the said issue.

9.

All the pending interim applications and civil application stand disposed of.

[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]