Shri Bhadravti Hatmag Vinkar Sahakari Soot Girani Ltd Thr. Chairman v. Avinash Prakash Bomdyal And ORS

(29)-WP-7982-22.doc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7982 OF 2022 Digitally signed by BALAJI GOVINDRAO PANCHAL Date:

2022.07.06 10:15:52 +0530 BALAJI GOVINDRAO PANCHAL Shri. Bhadravati Hatmag Vinkar Sahakari Soot Girani Ltd., Solapur ..Petitioner

Versus

Avinash Prakash Bomdyal and Ors.

..Respondents Mr. S. S. Patwardhan i/by I. M. Khairdi, for the Petitioner. Mr. V. H. Narvekar a/w Prasad Kulkarni & Aadesh Patil, for the Respondent No.1.

Mr. Deelip Patil Bankar - Chief Standing Counsel SCEA a/w Suhas Rohile, for Respondnet No.2.

Mr. S. D. Rayrikar, AGP for Respondent No.3.

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 5th JULY, 2022 P.C.

1.

The contentions are, the default to the tune of Rs.25,58,000/- on the part of the respondent was very much demonstrated, still the authority has failed to consider it while deciding the objection to the nomination of the respondent.

2.

If the aforesaid contentions are appreciated in the light of the election programme, what can be noticed is, the same has travelled at an advanced stage. I am informed that tomorrow is the date fixed for declaration of validly nominated candidates and allotment of symbols. In BGP.

(29)-WP-7982-22.doc.

that view of the matter, it will be inappropriate to show indulgence under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, as this Court is not suppose to interfere with the election programme.

3.

In that view of the matter, the petition fails, dismissed.

4.

However, this will not preclude the petitioner from questioning election of the returned candidate. [NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] BGP.