← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/1918/2025disposed off

Anil @ Dadya Ramdas Pawar v. The State Of Maharashtra

2025-09-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1918 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2829 OF 2022 Anil @ Dadya Ramdas Pawar .... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date:

2025.09.15 19:09:00 +0530 ----- Mr. Darshan Singh Rajpurohit i/b Mr. Ritesh Thobde a/w Mr. Changdev Shingade and Ms. Hansika Jadhav, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. S. S. Chaudhary, A.P.P., for the Respondent - State. ----- CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM DATE : 15th SEPTEMBER, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

By this application, the Applicant is seeking modification/relaxation of condition imposed on the Applicant by this Court (Coram: Amit Borkar, J) vide order dated 2nd August, 2023. 2.

It is contention of learned counsel for the Applicant that while granting bail to the Applicant, this Court has imposed the condition that the Applicant shall mark his presence before Investigating Officer on first Saturday of each month between 11:00 Shantanu S. Dhudum 1/3

a.m. to 2:00 p.m., till completion of the trial. Learned counsel further submitted that this order is passed around two years ago and Applicant is attending Court dates and Police Station regularly. The Applicant is a resident of Solapur, and he is attending the Police Station at Miraj. He is finding it difficult to attend the Police Station and Court dates. Hence, requested to allow the application. 3.

Learned APP strongly objected to allow the application on the ground that the Applicant has 14 antecedents. His presence is required before the Investigating Officer, hence, requested to reject the application.

4.

I have heard both learned counsel.

5.

Admittedly, trial has started and charge is framed against the Applicant. The Applicant is attending the Court dates regularly. Considering these facts, he cannot be compelled to attend the Police Station once the trial is started. Considering these facts, I pass the following order:

ORDER

i. The condition No.(c) imposed on the Applicant in Bail Application No.2829 of 2022, vide order dated 2nd August, 2023, is hereby relaxed.

Shantanu S. Dhudum 2/3

ii. The Applicant shall attend the concerned police station as and when required.

6.

In view of the above, the Interim Application is allowed and disposed off.

( SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum 3/3