Ajay Ramchandra Mhetar v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Addl. Chief Secretary And ORS.

by LAXMIKANT GOPAL CHANDAN Date:

2024.07.16 11:45:22 +0530

(7) CP-585.22.DOCX LAXMIKANT GOPAL CHANDAN lgc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 585 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO.11542 OF 2015 Ajay Ramchandra Mhetar

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and ors.

...Respondents

Mr Utkarsh Desai, i/by Mr Prashant Bhavake for the Petitioner. Mr A A Alaspurkar, AGP, for the Respondent - State.

CORAM

M.S. Sonak & Kamal Khata, JJ.

DATED:

15th July 2024 PC:- 1.

The learned counsel for Petitioner fairly states that the final lay out plan has already been sanctioned in compliance with the directions issued by this Court in its order dated 23rd August 2017. 2.

However, he points out that the amount deposited by the Petitioner has till date not been refunded.

3.

Since, the lay out plan is already sanctioned, we do not think this is a fit case to exercise our contempt jurisdiction. 15th July 2024

(7) CP-585.22.DOCX 4.

Regarding the issue of return of deposit, we grant liberty to the Petitioner to approach the corporation by filing a representation. 5.

If such representation is filed, the Corporation must dispose it of within four weeks i.e. on or before 12th August 2024. 6.

The Contempt Petition is disposed of in above terms. (Kamal Khata, J) (M.S. Sonak, J) 15th July 2024