Suraj Mahaveer Pimple v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

905-WP-5659-2021.doc shailaja

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5659 OF 2021 Suraj Mahaveer Pimple ] Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ] Through the Secretary, ] School Education & Sports Department, ] Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400 032.

] Respondents .....

Mr. Prashant Bhavake, for Petitioner.

Ms. P.N. Diwan, A.G.P, for Respondents No.1 to 5 - State. .....

CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND G.A. SANAP, JJ.

DATE : 23rd MARCH, 2022.

P.C.

1.

Heard Mr. Bhavake, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Diwan, learned A.G.P who appears by waiving notice for respondents No.1 to 5 - State. There is no need to issue notice to respondents No.6 and 7 as no relief is claimed against them. 2.

Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned Counsel for the parties present before the Court.

SHAILAJA SHRIKANT HALKUDE SHRIKANT HALKUDE Date: 2022.03.29 10:18:07 +0530

905-WP-5659-2021.doc 3.

We direct respondent No.5 to decide the proposal dated 23rd June, 2021 sent by Management seeking individual approval to the appointment of the petitioner to the post of "Laboratory Assistant" in accordance with law with applicable Government Resolutions at the earliest and, in any case, within eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order.

4.

However, in case, approval is granted, name of the petitioner shall be entered in Shalarth System and by allotting Shalarth I.D., his salary together with arrears, if any, shall be released to him at the earliest and, in any case, within a period of six weeks from the date of grant of approval, if any.

5.

Rule is made absolute in the above terms. No costs. [G.A. SANAP, J.] [SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.]