Adnyan B. More v. Shamrao K. Pant

214-WP437-96.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 437 OF 1996 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 438 OF 1996 Adnyan Bapu More

...Petitioner

Versus

Shamrao Kashinath Pant

...Respondent

None for the Petitioner.

Mr. Dhananjay Lonkar, for the Respondent.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED:

1st April, 2019 PC:­ 1.

None for the Petitioner.

2.

The notices were directed to be issued on Court motion. The report of service reveals that the Petitioner could not be served as the Bailiff reported that the Petitioner expired prior to two years. The report is marked 'X' and annexed to this order.

3.

In the circumstances, no fruitful purpose will be served by keeping the petitions pending.

4.

Hence, the petitions stand dismissed.

5.

Rule discharged.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 1/1