Sharddha Atul Ladsavangikar v. Atul Subhash Ladsavangikar

35-wp-9340-2023.doc Nikita

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9340 OF 2023 Sharddha Atul Ladsavangikar ... Petitioner V/s.

Atul Subhash Ladsavangikar ... Respondent NIKITA KAILAS DARADE NIKITA KAILAS DARADE Date: 2023.09.08 15:28:01 +0530 Ms. Reena Prajapati i/b Mr. A. Pawaskar for the Petitioner.

Mr. Kapil Shetye for the Respondent.

CORAM

: AMIT BORKAR, J.

DATED : SEPTEMBER 8, 2023 P.C.:

1.

Challenge in this petition is to the order passing "No Say Order" against the petitioner in an application filed under Order 39 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908. 2.

The learned advocate for the petitioner on instructions states that the main application under Order 39 Rule 11 is not pressed by the Respondent before the Trial Court. In that view of the matter, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition. 3.

The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of as infructuous. (AMIT BORKAR, J.)