Mahadeo Govind Ghare v. Chandrakant Govind Ghare And ORS.

Tauseef 04.1-1364.2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1364 OF 2017 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.96 OF 2008 Mahadeo Govind Ghare ...Applicant V/s.

Chandrakant Govind Ghare & Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Sharad T. Bhosale, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Abhijit Kulkarni for Respondent Nos.1 to 6. Mr. N. V. Bandiwadekar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.7 to 18.

CORAM

: A. S. GADKARI, J.

DATE : 19th JULY, 2021.

(Through Video Conferencing) P.C. :

1.

This is an Application for bringing legal heirs of the Respondent No.29D on record. It is stated that, the Respondent No.29D expired on 20th July 2014. There is a delay of 2 years and 262 days in filing the present Application.

2.

Learned Advocate for the Applicant submitted that, the legal heirs of the Respondent No.29D have been duly served and Affidavit of Service dated 9th February 2018 to that effect has been filed on record. Despite service, none-appears for the Respondent Nos.29D, 29(D)(i) and 29(D)(ii).

Pg 1 of 2

Tauseef 04.1-1364.2017.doc 3.

Mr. Kulkarni, learned Advocate appearing for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6 and Mr. Bandiwadekar, learned Advocate appearing for the Respondent Nos.7 to 18 have no serious objection for allowing the present Application.

4.

For the reasons stated in the Application, delay is condoned and Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), (b) and (d). 5.

Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of four weeks from today, in the record of the Court and simultaneously in the copies served upon the learned Advocates for the respective Respondents. (A. S. GADKARI, J.) Pg 2 of 2