Anil Shrikrishna Kulkarni v. Kum. Aparna Sunil Kulkarni And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 33 OF 2014 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO. 20498 OF 2013 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.120 OF 2013 Anil Shrikrishna Kulkarni ...

Appellant/Applicant vs.

Kumari Aparna Sunil Kulkarni & Anr....

Respondents .....

Mr.Nandu Pawar for the Appellant/Applicant.

Mr.R.V.Bansode for the Respondents.

....

CORAM : K.K. TATED, J.

DATE : 07TH OCTOBER, 2015 P.C.:

.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties. This application is for condonation of 46 days delay in filing the review petition. 2.

Advocate Mr.Bansode appearing on behalf of the Respondents vehemently opposed the present Civil Application. He submits that the Applicant failed to show sufficient cause for condonation of inordinate delay in preferring the Review Petition. Hence there is no substance to condone the delay and the same to be dismissed with cost.

3.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Applicant and averments made in the Civil Application I satisfied that the Applicant has made out a case for allowing this Civil Application.

1/3

4.

Hence following order.

(a) Delay of 45 days in filing Review Petition is condoned. (b) Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly. (K.K. TATED, J.) 2/3

CERTIFICATE Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment/Order.

3/3