Shri Ramchandra Sadashiv Shelke And ORS v. Learned District Collector Of Kolhapur And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13395 OF 2017 Shri. Krushnah Ganpati Chougale And Ors. .
..Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 998 OF 2017 Shri. Eknath Kondiba Sawant And Ors.
...Petitioners
Versus
State Of Maharashtra Through Collector And Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9315 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2026 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9315 OF 2016 Shri. Suresh Sayaji Kate And Ors.
...Petitioners
Versus
State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 13987 OF 2016 The Malegaon Co.operative Spinning Mills Ltd. Through Secretary
...Petitioner
Versus
State Of Maharashtra Through Office Of Govt. Pleader And Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7286 OF 2017 Shri Ramchandra Sadashiv Shelke And Ors.
...Petitioners
Versus
Learned District Collector Of Kolhapur And Ors.
...Respondents
Kiran Kawre 1/3
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11444 OF 2016 Mr. Vijay Awatram Ladkani And Anr.
...Petitioners
Versus
State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 14011 OF 2016 Maruti Shankar Tambe
...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION(ST) NO. 25646 OF 2019 Santosh Ganpatrao Tambe And Ors.
...Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra Through Dept.
Of Revenue And Forest And Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 13292 OF 2016 Shri. Krushnath Ganapati Chougale And Ors.
...Petitioners
Versus
State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
...Respondents
----- None for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. P. Kakde, G. P. a/w Mr. A. P. Vanarase, AGP for the Respondent/State. ----- C0RAM : G. S. KULKARNI & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 05, 2024 PC :
1.
Learned Government Pleader, Appellate Side had circulated with the Registry a list of old infructuous matters so that these matters could be listed Kiran Kawre 2/3
and disposed of as infructuous. This petition is one of such matters in the list. This list of infructuous matters was notified by the office by its notice dated 25 January 2024, by which the parties/advocates were intimated that if the proceedings have not become infructuous, then a praecipe be submitted in the office before its listing stating that the matter needs to be adjudicated. Accordingly, after such prior notice, this matter is listed today before this Court.
No praecipe has been received on behalf of the petitioner or the advocate for the petitioner stating that something would survive for adjudication in this petition.
Even when this petition was called out, none appears for the petitioner. It, therefore, appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute this petition and/or it has become infructuous. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of, however, with liberty to the petitioner to revive the petition in the event the petitioner feels that the cause of action still survives. 4.
Disposed of in the above terms. No costs.
5.
Civil Application, if any, also stands disposed of. (FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) Kiran Kawre 3/3