Sandeep Raghunath Patil And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

APEAL.834-2013.doc Dond

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 834 OF 2013 1] Sandip Raghunath Patil 2] Amin Ibrahim Shaikh ..Appellants Vs The State of Maharashtra Through Laxmipuri Police Station, Kolhapur.

..Respondent ­­­­­ Ms. Payoshi Roy I/b Dr. Yug Mohit Chaudhary for the Appellants. Ms. P.P. Shinde, APP for the State.

CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.S.GADKARI, J.J.

DATE : 21st February 2019.

P.C.:

1] For the reasons separately recorded, we pass the following Order:­ (i) The impugned Judgment and Order dated 29th May 2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge­2, Kolhapur in Sessions Case No.71 of 2010 is hereby quashed and set aside; (ii) The appellants are hereby acquitted of all the offences alleged against them. However, the directions regarding disposal of muddemal articles are hereby confirmed;

1/2

APEAL.834-2013.doc (iii) Criminal Appeal No.834 of 2013 is allowed on above terms: (iv) All the concerned to act upon an authenticated copy of the Operative part of the Judgment.

(A.S.GADKARI, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.) 2/2