Shri. Balu Vitthal Waghmode v. Central Council Of Indian Medicine, Through President And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8105 OF 2014 Balu Vitthal Waghmare.
..Petitioner.
Versus
Central Council of Indian Medicine and Others.
..Respondents.
AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8106 OF 2014 Sanjivani Manik Jadhav ..Petitioner.
Versus
Central Council of Indian Medicine and Others.
..Respondents.
AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8101 OF 2014 Sheetal Umesh Patil ..Petitioner.
Versus
Central Council of Indian Medicine and Others.
..Respondents.
AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8107 OF 2014 Rajesh Pundlik Koli ..Petitioner.
Versus
Central Council of Indian Medicine and Others.
..Respondents.
AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8109 OF 2014 Prashant Annaso Bhapkar ..Petitioner.
Versus
Central Council of Indian Medicine and Others.
..Respondents.
AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8110 OF 2014 Yogesh Shrikant Mahadik ..Petitioner.
Versus
Central Council of Indian Medicine and Others.
..Respondents.
1 / 3
AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8100 OF 2014 Ravindra Narayan Koli ..Petitioner.
Versus
Central Council of Indian Medicine and Others.
..Respondents.
AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8103 OF 2014 Ravindra Subhash Shishte ..Petitioner.
Versus
Central Council of Indian Medicine and Others.
..Respondents.
AND WRIT PETITION NO. 5231 OF 2014 Annaso Dadaso Birmale ..Petitioner.
Versus
Central Council of Indian Medicine and Others.
..Respondents.
AND WRIT PETITION NO. 11399 OF 2014 Bahubali Jinnappa Kempwade ..Petitioner.
Versus
Central Council of Indian Medicine and Others.
..Respondents.
Mr. Vijay Killedear for the Petitioner.
Mr. Mohd. Asadullah Bhaikh i/b Y. K. Singh for Respondent No.1.
Mr. U. V. Warunjikar for Respondent Nos. 6 & 7. Mr. V. M. Sagare, AGP for the State.
Coram : Ranjit More & Dr.(Smt) S. S. Phansalkar-Joshi, JJ.
Date : March 8, 2016.
P. C. :
1.
Having heard learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties, we find that the Petitioners have an 2 / 3
alternate and efficacious remedy of appeal which will lie before the Grievances Committee constituted under section 53 of the Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Act, 1998. In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to entertain these writ petitions and exercise our writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Resultantly, writ petitions are dismissed.
2.
If any appeal as contemplated under section 53 of the said Act is filed, the Grievances Committee shall deal with the same and decide it as expeditiously as possible and preferably within the period of 6 months of its filing. We clarify that we have not expressed any opinion on the rival contentions and the pleas raised in the petitions and they are kept open to be canvassed before the Grievances Committee. [Dr. (Smt.) S. S. Phansalkar-Joshi, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] 3 / 3