← Library
Bombay High CourtAPL/911/2016disposed off

Ashok Madhukar Malavankar And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra

2024-10-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal,Hon'Ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale2 pages

1 / 2 07-APL-911-16-&-APPR-148-17.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.911 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.148 OF 2017 Ashok Madhukar Malavankar & Ors.

.... Applicants versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

.... Respondents .......

• Mr. Pramod Avhad i/b. Kuldeep U. Nikam, Advocate for Applicants.

• Mr. Vinod S. Chate, APP for the State/Respondent. • Mr. Umesh R. Mankapure a/w Nilesh Wabale a/w Rutuja Khatmode, Advocate for Respondent No.2.

CORAM

: SARANG V. KOTWAL & DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.

DATE : 15th OCTOBER, 2024 P.C. :

1.

This application is filed for quashing of the FIR registered vide C.R.No.209/2016 at Sangli City Police Station. 2.

Learned APP on instructions states that after investigation, the investigating agency has filed 'B' summary Digitally signed by MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Date:

2024.10.17 11:33:22 +0530 report before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, 3rd MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Court, Sangli. The statement is recorded and accepted. Nesarikar

2 / 2 07-APL-911-16-&-APPR-148-17.odt 3.

In view of this statement, the learned counsel for the Applicants does not press this application, as according to him the application has become infructuous. He prays for withdrawal of this application.

4.

Permission is granted. The application is allowed to be withdrawn.

5.

The Applicants would be at liberty to adopt the appropriate legal proceedings in accordance with law, in case, the 'B' summary report is not accepted by the learned Magistrate. 6.

The application stands disposed of accordingly. With disposal of the main application, the Interim Application is also disposed of.

(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)