Sandip Haribhau Kale v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

90-BA-2479-2025 (CR).DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2479 OF 2025 Sandip Haribhau Kale ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra And Anr.

...Respondents

.....

Mr. Aniket Nikam Advocate for Applicant.

Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for the Respondent No.1-State. Adv. V. S. Kupawade Advocate for Respondent No.2. .....

CORAM

:

SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE :

18th NOVEMBER, 2025 P.C.

1.

Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned APP for the Respondent-State and learned counsel for Respondent No.2. 2.

Learned counsel for Respondent No.2 submits that the coaccused who have been released on bail are not appearing before the trial Court. Hence, charge is not framed.

3.

Considering the submission of learned counsel for Respondent No.2, the learned trial Court is requested to issue Nonbailable warrant order against the co-accused, who are remained absent before the trial Court and frame the charge as early as Digitally signed by SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Date:

2025.11.20 10:47:56 +0530 SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Sajakali Jamadar

90-BA-2479-2025 (CR).DOC possible. The applicant is behind bar for more than two and half years.

4.

Learned counsel for applicant on instructions seeks leave to withdraw this application with liberty to file a fresh bail application after four months.

5.

Considering the submission of learned counsel for applicant Application is allowed to be withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 6.

Bail Application is dismissed and disposed of as withdrawn. 7.

As the learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 appointed through legal-aid, professional Fees of Rs.10,000/- be paid to him. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Sajakali Jamadar