Sunil Madhusudan Golconda v. Rakesh Alias Balu Shantilal Tated And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1179 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.741 OF 2013 SUNIL MADHUSUDAN GOLKONDA )...APPELLANT V/s.

RAKESH ALIAS BALU SHANTILAL TATED ) AND OTHERS )...RESPONDENTS WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.853 OF 2013 RAKESH @ BALU SHANTILAL TATED )...APPELLANT V/s.

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.8 OF 2014 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...APPELLANT V/s.

RAKESH ALIAS BALU SHANTILAL TATED ) AND OTHERS )...RESPONDENTS WITH avk 1/3

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1317 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.741 OF 2013 SUNIL MADHUSUDAN GOLKONDA )...APPELLANT V/s.

RAKESH ALIAS BALU SHANTILAL TATED ) AND OTHERS )...RESPONDENTS WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.889 OF 2015 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...APPELLANT V/s.

RAKESH ALIAS BALU SHANTILAL TATED ) AND OTHERS )...RESPONDENTS Mr.Ajay Bhise, Advocate for the Appellant.

Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent - State. Mr.V.V.Purwant, Advocate in Criminal Appeal No.853 of 2013.

CORAM

:

INDRAJIT MAHANTY & A. M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE :

8th AUGUST 2019 avk 2/3

P.C. :

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1179 OF 2019 The learned counsel for the applicant, who happens to be the First Informant, contended that as the respondent no.1 herein had committed breach of bond executed by him, as directed by the learned trial court while convicting the respondent no.1, he wants to prefer an appropriate application before the learned trial court. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the instant application with liberty as prayed. The application is accordingly disposed off as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

Place the connected appeals as per its turn.

(A. M. BADAR, J.) (INDRAJIT MAHANTY, J.) avk 3/3