Prakash Bapuso Herwade v. Shantinath Bapuso Herwade

VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Tikam 1/2 21-IA 18176-22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 18178 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8769 OF 2009 by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date: 2022.09.23 10:35:55 +0530 Prakash Bapuso Herwade Applicant ...

In the matter between Shantinath Bapuso Herwade Petitioner ...

Vs.

Prakash Bapuso Herwade

...Respondent

------- Mr. Manoj Patil i/b. Umesh R. Mankapure, Advocate for the Applicant and for Respondent in WP No. 8769 of 2009 Mr. Makarand Kale i/b. Yogesh Sankpal for Advocate for the Respondent No.1 ------- CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.

TUESDAY, 20TH SEPTEMBER, 2022.

P.C. :

1.

Mr Patil, learned counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, submits that the suit itself is rendered infructuous since the cause of action does not survive, and therefore

Tikam 2/2 21-IA 18176-22 Petition, be disposed of. If that be so, Applicant-Original Defendant may move appropriate application, for dismissal of the suit itself. In case, such an application is filed, the trial Court shall decide the application on merits.

2.

Interim application is disposed of accordingly. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)