← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10869/2018rule made absolute

Waghmode Sindhubai Balbhim v. The Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Solapur And ORS.

2018-10-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice B.R. Gavai3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10868 OF 2018 Entyaj Pasha Jilani Jahagirdar ..Petitioner

Versus

The Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Solapur and others ..Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.10863 OF 2018 Suresh Vasant Lavate ..Petitioner

Versus

The Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Solapur and others ..Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.10864 OF 2018 Ganesh M. Bhajnavale ..Petitioner

Versus

The Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Solapur and others ..Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.10865 OF 2018 Sachin Jivraj Urade ..Petitioner

Versus

The Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Solapur and others ..Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.10866 OF 2018 Shital Abaji Jadhav ..Petitioner

Versus

BGP. 1 of 3

The Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Solapur and others ..Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.10867 OF 2018 Pramod Shivaji Kolase­Patil ..Petitioner

Versus

The Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Solapur and others ..Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.10869 OF 2018 Waghmode Sindhubai Balbhim ..Petitioner

Versus

The Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Solapur and others ..Respondents Mr. I. M. Khairdi, Advocate for the Petitioners in all the Petitions.

Mr. S. B. Kalel, AGP for Respondent - State. CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & M. S. KARNIK, JJ.

DATE : 19th OCTOBER, 2018 ORAL JUDGMENT (B. R. Gavai, J) 1] Writ Petition Nos.10863 of 2018, 10864 of 2018, 10865 of 2018, 10866 of 2018, 10867 of 2018 and 10869 of 2018 are not not on board. Upon mentioning, they are taken on board. BGP. 2 of 3

2] Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent of parties.

3] The limited relief claimed in the above Petitions is for a direction to the Respondent - Education Officer to decide the proposal for grant of approval to the appointment of the Petitioners. 4] The Respondent - Education Officer is directed to decide the proposal for grant of approval with regard to the appointment of the Petitioners as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of four weeks from today in the light of the judgment dated 10th July 2017 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.8587 of 2016 with connected Writ Petitions.

5] Rule is accordingly made absolute in the aforesaid terms.

[M. S. KARNIK, J.] [B. R. GAVAI, J.] BGP. 3 of 3