Rajeev Vinayak Choudhari v. Madhav Narayan Gogate And ANR.

Shubhada S Kadam 73-ia-18780-2022 in fa-471-2005.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.18780 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.471 OF 2005 Rajeev Vinayak Choudhari ....Applicant/ Appellant

Versus

Dr. Madhav Narayan Gogate & Anr.

....Respondents Mr. Jayant Bardeskar, Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant. Mr. Shrirang Katneshwarkar i/b. M. G. Misar, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.

CORAM : S. G. DIGE, J.

DATE : 23rd FEBRUARY 2023.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondent No.2.

2.

Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the applicant and reasons mentioned in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and disposed of. (S. G. DIGE, J.) by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date:

2023.02.24 19:27:18 +0530 1/1 SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM