Sou Rabia Salim Bagwan v. The Collector, Kolhapur And ORS
by VIDYA SURESH AMIN Date:
2021.09.03 12:12:06 +0530 VIDYA SURESH AMIN 40.WP9261_2009 Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9261 OF 2009 Sou. Dhruvati Sadanand Dalvai ... Petitioner Vs.
The Collector, Kolhapur & Ors.
... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9263 OF 2009 Sou. Varsha Deepak Dhere ... Petitioner Vs.
The Collector, Kolhapur & Ors.
... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9537 OF 2009 Sou. Sarika Tanaji Bhokare ... Petitioner Vs.
The Collector, Kolhapur & Ors.
... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9535 OF 2009 Sou. Padmavati Chandrakant Bhandare ... Petitioner Vs.
The Collector, Kolhapur & Ors.
... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9536 OF 2009 Sou. Rabia Salim Bagwan ... Petitioner Vs.
The Collector, Kolhapur & Ors.
... Respondents None for Petitioner.
Smt. P.N. Diwan AGP for State.
Mr. S.B. Shetye for Resp No.6 in WP/9261/2009, WP/9263/2009. Mr Vinod P. Sangivkar a/w Ms Vaishnavi Gholve for Resp No.3. CORAM : G.S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE : 27th AUGUST 2021
40.WP9261_2009 P.C.:
1.
Learned Government Pleader, Appellate Side had circulated in the Registry a list of old infructuous matters so that these matters could be listed and disposed of as infructuous. These petitions are such matters in the list. These matters were accordingly listed before this Court on 20 August, 2021 with a prior notice dated 17 August, 2021, by which the parties were intimated that if the proceedings have not become infructuous, then a praecipe be submitted in the office before its listing on 20 August 2021.
2.
On 20 August, 2021, when these petitions were listed before the Court and was called out, none appeared for the petitioners nor a praecipe in response to the notice dated 17 August, 2021 stating that the matters have not become infructuous was placed on record. However, to give a second chance to the parties, the Court adjourned these petitions, to be listed today with a specific advance notice dated 24 August, 2021, that the parties are again permitted to submit a praecipe if the proceedings are not infructuous. Despite such second notice, no praecipe is received in the present proceedings on behalf of the petitioners.
3.
It, therefore, appears that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute these petitions and/or they have become infructuous. These petitions are, accordingly, disposed of, however, with liberty to the petitioners to revive these petitions in the event the petitioners feel that the cause of action still survives.
4.
Disposed of in the above terms. No costs.
(G.S. KULKARNI, J.)