Bharat Mrugendra Patil And ORS. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

914-Wp-3840-2014.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3840 OF 2014 Bharat Mrugendra Patil & Ors.

... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents ------ Mr. Shivaji Masal a/w. Ms. Ashwini Barad for the Petitioners. Mrs. S.N. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State. ------ Coram : M. S. Karnik & Sharmila U. Deshmukh, JJ.

Date : 1st October 2025.

P. C. :

1.

Learned A.P.P. on instructions submits that the Petitioner No.1 - Bharat Mrugendra Patil and the Petitioner No.3- Koushik Bharat Patil have expired.

2.

This Petition for quashing of the F.I.R. registered with Vishrambaug Police Station, Sangli for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 471, 474 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.) is filed in the year 2014.

osk 1 of

914-Wp-3840-2014.doc 3.

It is alleged that the Petitioners entered into an agreement for sale in respect of the Plot No. 13560, admeasuring 669.7 mtrs. with the complainant. The Petitioners then sold very same plot of land to Annasaheb Kallappa Upadhe, Asandas Radhakrushna Nanwani, Milind Ramrao Patil by executing bogus agreements for sale. Thereafter, on 3rd October 2013 the said plot was sold to one Mr. Milind Ramrao Patil, which was a hollow agreement of sale. The complainant therefore filed the complaint alleging that on the basis of false documents, the Petitioners have cheated the complainant.

4.

Learned A.P.P. submits that the trial has already commenced. 5.

In the facts of the present case, we are not inclined to entertain the present Petition, considering the nature of allegations. 6.

The Writ Petition is rejected.

7.

All contentions of both the parties on merits are kept open. [ Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. ] [ M. S. Karnik, J. ] by OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Date:

2025.10.01 20:36:44 +0530 OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN osk 2 of