← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/12381/2022disposed off

Mr. Pramod Vasant Patil And ORS v. The District Deputy Registrar , Co-Op. Soc. Kolhapur And ORS

2023-04-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.R. Shriram,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil2 pages

15.wp.12381.2022.doc Rajeshri Aher

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 12381 OF 2022 Pramod Vasant Patil and Ors.

...Petitioners

Versus

The District Deputy Registrar, Co-op.

Soc. Kolhapur and Ors.

...Respondents

....

Mr.Vivek Patil, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr.K.S. Thorat, AGP for State.

Mr.S.S. Yadav a/w Mr.Harvinder Kaur Rogi, Advocate for Respondent No.2.

Mr.Kush M. Lahankar i/b Mr.S.R. Ganbavale, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 & 4.

....

CORAM

: K. R. SHRIRAM & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATED : 20th April 2023 P.C.:

One of the prayer sought in the Petition is to direct Respondent No.1 District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Kolhapur to consider representations of Petitioners made vide their letters dated 20th July 2022, 6th August 2022 and 13th August 2022. We note that the Petition has been affirmed on 20th September 2022, a month after the last representation and two months after the first representation. Mr.Thorat states Respondent No.1 will have lot of such applications to decide, and, therefore, would not have been able to Digitally signed by RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER Date:

2023.04.24 19:14:43 +0530 consider those representations. At the same time Mr.Thorat states that RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER 1/2

15.wp.12381.2022.doc within three months, Respondent No.1 will endeavour to consider and dispose the representations mentioned in prayer Clause (c) of the Petition. If there are any other representations filed by Respondent Nos.2,3 or 4 relating to the same subject matter of this Petition, Respondent No.1 shall dispose those as well along with the representations filed by Petitioners.

A personal hearing be granted and the notice of personal hearing to be communicated atleast five working days in advance. Petition disposed.

We clarify that we have not made any observations on merits of the matter.

Mr.Yadav and Mr.Lahankar state that they shall address a communication to Respondent No.1 to tag their representations as well alongwith Petitioners' representations.

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.) 2/2