Atul Sumant Mundhe v. The State Of Maharashtra Thru Secretary, Rural Development Dept. And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11585 OF 2022 Varsha Devidas Bhange ...

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...

Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11588 OF 2022 Vishal Shankar Navale ...

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...

Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11589 OF 2022 Atul Sumant Mundhe ...

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...

Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11590 OF 2022 Bharat Balasaheb Tupe ...

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...

Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11587 OF 2022 Sulabha Tulashiram Dhapate ...

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...

Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11857 OF 2022 Ramrao Narayan Nagargoje ...

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...

Respondents 1/3

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11859 OF 2022 Harishchandra Ajinath Kadu ...

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...

Respondents Mr. Vivek Rane i/b. Mr. Balaji S. Shinde, Advocate for the Petitioners.

Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP for the Respondent No.1/State. Mr. S. D. Shinde i/b. Mr. Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3.

CORAM:

S.V. GANGAPURWALA & R. N. LADDHA, JJ.

DATED :

OCTOBER 4, 2022 P.C.

1.

Writ Petition No. 11857 of 2022 and Writ Petition No. 11859 of 2022 are not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board.

2.

The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are transferred at inconvenient place and not in accordance with provisions of Circular dated 28th June 2018. The petitioners have made representations with the Chief Executive Offcer of the Zillha Parishad. It is submitted that the said representations are yet not considered.

2.

The learned AGP appears for respondent No.1. We have heard learned Advocate for the Zillha Parishad. 3.

In case the representations of petitioners are pending with respondent No.2, then the respondent No.2 shall decide the same on its own merits expeditiously preferably within six weeks.

2/3

4.

The writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. (R. N. LADDHA, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) Digitally signed by RAJU DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD Date:

2022.10.06 15:57:33 +0530 RAJU DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD 3/3