Suraj Satappa Patil v. State Of Maharashtra

501. BA 2688-2023.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.2688 OF 2023 Suraj Satappa Patil .Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr. Tanaji Mhatugade, Advocate, for the Applicant. Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, APP, for the Respondent - State. CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATE : 07.03.2024 P. C.

1.

A praecipe has been moved for Speaking to the Minutes of the Order dated 04.03.2024 by Mr. Mhatugade, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant.

2.

In the third line of paragraph no.10 of the aforesaid order, instead of "District - Kolhapur" it should be 'Taluka - Karveer, District - Kolhapur'. In the first line of paragraph no.12(b), instead of "Kolhapur district", it should be 'Taluka - Karveer, District - Kolhapur'. 3.

The aforesaid order be accordingly corrected and uploaded. 4.

The praecipe stands disposed of.

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Anand Page No. 1