← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8300/2021disposed off

Mangesh Balkrushna Nevse v. Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division And ORS

2021-11-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni3 pages

DSS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8297 OF 2021 Digitally signed by DINESH SADANAND SHERLA Date:

2021.11.30 18:54:33 +0500 DINESH SADANAND SHERLA Chandrakant S. Yadav

...Petitioner

V/s.

Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division and ors.

...Respondents

AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8300 OF 2021 Mangesh B. Nevse

...Petitioner

V/s.

Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division and ors.

...Respondents

----- Mr. M. V. Kawchale and Mr. Omkar Pujari for the Petitioners in both petitions.

Mr. C.D. Mali, AGP for the Respondent - State in WP 8297 of 2021 Ms Vaishali S. Nimbalkar, AGP for the Respondent - State in WP 8300 of 2021.

----- C0RAM : G. S. KULKARNI, J.

DATE : NOVEMBER 30, 2021.

PC :

1] Not on board. Taken on board on applications moved on behalf of the petitioners.

2] The case of the petitioners, in both these petitions, is that respondent No.4 as impleaded, in both these petitions, were disqualifed under the provisions of Section 68 read with 64(4) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. 1/3

3] The substantive applications praying to disqualify the respondents have been moved by the petitioners before the Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division. Such appeals were fled in June 2021 and are pending adjudication. Case of the petitioners is that hearing on such appeals is intentionally being delayed at the behest of such respondent so that these respondents can participate in the elections which could be held for the post of Sabapathi/Chairman of the Zilla Parishad.

4] The learned counsel for the petitioners, in both petitions, has fairly submitted that no interim applications have been fled in the said proceedings, which are pending before the Divisional Commissioner.

5] In the above circumstances, in my opinion, it would be appropriate that the petitioners pursue the pending appeals as also they are at liberty to fle appropriate interim applications, if the petitioners intend to seek any urgent reliefs. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the interim applications would be fled before the Divisional Commissioner within two days from today. If such applications are fled within two days from today, the Divisional Commissioner shall consider the same within one 2/3

week from the date of fling of such applications and pass appropriate orders on such application. All the contentions of the parties on such proceedings are expressly kept open. 6] The Divisional Commissioner shall make an endeavour to adjudicate the appeals, which are pending for quite some time from June 2021 as expeditiously as possible and positively before 31.1.2022. All contentions of all the parties on the appeals and the preferred application are expressly kept open. 7] Both Writ Petitions are disposed of in the above terms. No costs.

(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) 3/3