← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/13058/2018disposed off

Bholaso S/O Vitthal @ Vithu Chaugule v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary And ORS.

2020-12-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja16 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 6819 OF 2021 Ajay Daulat Jadhav & Ors.

... Petitioners Vs.

State of Maharashtra through General Administration & Ors.

... Respondents ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1306 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO.6819 OF 2021 Ajay Daulat Jadhav & Ors.

... Applicants Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.12028 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 6819 OF 2021 State of Maharashtra through its Principal Secretary ... Applicant Vs.

Ajay Daulat Jadhav & Ors.

... Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 11845 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 6819 OF 2021 State of Maharashtra through its Principal Secretary ... Applicant Vs.

Ajay Daulat Jadhav & Ors.

... Respondents

WITH WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 58 OF 2021 Shri Anandrao Narayan More ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Maharashtra through Its Chief Secretary & Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 2081 OF 2021 Sachin Haridas Kapane ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Maharashtra through General Administration Department, Mantralaya & Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 2941 OF 2021 Pranjal Pramod Patil & Ors.

... Petitioners Vs.

State of Maharashtra through General Administration Department, & Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 4228 OF 2021 Gorakshnath Asaram Agale & Anr.

... Petitioners Vs.

State of Maharashtra through General Administration Department, Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 6995 OF 2021

Milind Ganpat Kadam & Ors.

... Petitioners Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 10077 OF 2021 Nandkumar Dashrath More & Ors.

... Petitioners Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2090 OF 2021 Krishna Piraji Jagtap ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 11573 OF 2021 Association of Sub Ordinate Service of Engineers & Ors.

... Petitioners Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 11751 OF 2021 Pranjal Pramod Patil & Ors.

... Petitioners Vs.

State of Maharashtra Through General Administration Department & Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2091 OF 2021

Vivek Vishwanath Patil ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2092 OF 2021 Ashwini A. Ghodake & Ors.

... Petitioners Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 12001 OF 2021 Sanjaykumar Shashikant Kokane ... Petitioner Vs.

Sitaram Kunte, Chief Secretary of State of Maharashtra ... Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3798 OF 2020 IN WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 97023 OF 2020 Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Mantralaya ... Applicant Vs.

Bholaso S/o. Vitthal Alias Vithu Chaugule ... Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1307 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 97023 OF 2020 Ankush Ashokrao Palve & Anr.

... Applicants Vs.

Sanjaykumar Shashikant Kokane & Ors.

... Respondents

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1305 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 97023 OF 2020 Sunil Mahadevrao Thakre ... Applicant Vs.

Sanjaykumar Shashikant Kokane & Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 97023 OF 2020 Bhimashankar Mallinath Mitkare & Ors.

... Petitioners Vs.

State of Maharashtra through General Administration Department,& Ors.

... Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 4375 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 97030 OF 2020 Milind Ganpat Kadam & Ors.

... Applicants Vs.

Bhimashankar Mallinath Mitkare ... Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3799 OF 2020 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3800 OF 2020 Bhagwan Rajabhau Khedkar & Ors.

... Applicants Vs.

Bholaso S/o. Vitthal @ Vithu Chaugule ... Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 98060 OF 2020

Chintaman Gulabrao Vanjari ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Maharashtra through General Administration Department, & Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 98876 OF 2020 Dhananjay Ambadas Patil ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Maharashtra through General Administration Department, & Ors.

... Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1990 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO.13058 OF 2018 Bholaso S/o. Vitthal Alias Vithu Chaugule & Ors.

... Petitioners Vs.

State of Maharashtra and ors.

... Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10955 OF 2016 Shri Rajendra Bhanudas Andhale ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Maharashtra through the Under Secretary Rural Development and Irrigation Department & Ors.

... Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 13058 OF 2018

Bholaso s/o. Vitthal @ Vithu Chaugule ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary & Ors.

... Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 770 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 13058 OF 2018 Shri Bhalaso s/o. Vitthal @ Vithu Chaugule ... Applicant Vs.

State of Maharashtra ... Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 12027 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 13058 OF 2018 State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary & Ors.

... Applicants Vs.

Bholaso S/o. Vitthal Alias Vithu Chaugule & Ors.

... Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 394 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 13058 OF 2018 Pranjal Pramod Patil ... Applicant Vs.

Bholaso S/o. Vitthal Alias Vithu Chaugule ... Respondent AND CONTEMPT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 92 OF 2021

Chintaman Gulabrao Vanjari ... Petitioner Vs.

Sanjay Kumar, Chief Secretary ... Respondent ...........

Mr. B. M. Chatterji, Senior Advocate alongwith Mr. Nikhil Waje, Mr. Vishesh Srivastav, Advocates for the Applicant/Petitioner in IA No. 1306 of 2021 in Writ Petition (Stamp) No.6819 of 2021. Mr. Abhijeet Desai alongwith Mr. Amol Jagtap, Advocates for the Petitioner in Writ Petition (Stamp) No.6995 of 2021. Mr. Yashodeep Deshmukh alongwith Ms. Vaidehi Deshmukh, Ms. Sonali Pawar and Ms. Kinjal Kanani i/by Mr. Akshay R. Kapadia, Advocates for the Petitioners in Writ Petition (Stamp) No.11573 of 2021 and Writ Petition No.2092 of 2021.

Mr. Anoop U. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner/Applicant in Writ Petition (Stamp) No.97023 of 2020 and IA No.1305 of 2021. Mr. Balasaheb Deshmukh for the Intervenors in I.A. Nos.3799 of 2020 and 3800 of 2020 in WP No.13058 of 2018.

Dr. Uday Warunjikar, Senior Advocate i/by Mr. Vinod Sangvikar, Advocate for the Petitioner and Applicant in Writ Petition No.13058 of 2018 with I. A. No.770 of 2021 & IA No.1990 of 2021. Mr. Vinod Sangvikar a/w Ms. Vaishnavi Gholave, Advocates for the Petitioner in WP No.58 of 2021.

Mr. Tejesh Dande alongwith Mr. Bharat Gadhavi i/by M/s Tejesh Dande & Associates, Advocates for the Petitioners in Writ Petition (Stamp) No.2941 of 2021 and Contempt Petition (Stamp) No.11751 of 2021. Mr. Sugandh B. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Petitioner in Contempt Petition (Stamp) Nos.92 of 2021, 12001 of 2021 and Writ Petition (Stamp) Nos.4228 of 2021, 10077 of 2021 and Writ Petition Nos.2090 of 2021, 2091 of 2021, Writ Petition Stamp No.97023 of 2020 with IA No.1307 of 2021, Writ Petition Stamp Nos.98060 of 2020 and Writ Petition No. 10955 of 2016.

Mr.Mahendra Shingade, Advocate for the Petitioner in WPST No. 2081 of 2021 and WPST No.98876 of 2020.

Mr. A. A. Kumbhakoni, AG alongwith Mr. P. P. Kakade, GP, Mr. Ashutosh Kulkarni, "B" Panel Counsel, Smt. A. A. Purav, AGP, with Smt. G. P. Sonawane, AGP for the Respondent-State.

CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MADHAV J. JAMDAR, JJ.

DATE : 8th OCTOBER, 2021 P.C.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

On 14.09.2021, we had passed the following order :- "Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Pursuant to our previous order dated 7th September, 2021, learned Advocate General has filed a signed statement dated 14th September, 2021 which we have perused. 3.

At this stage, it may not be necessary to refer to in details contents of the said statement.

4.

Suffice it to say that, according to Mr.Kumbhakoni, learned Advocate General, the process for undertaking promotion to both the categories of petitioners i.e. persons with disabilities and persons without disabilities is being undertaken presently. However, the process involves several stages and cannot be completed overnight.

5.

He submits that majority of the litigation pertains to the Public Works Department and secretary of this department is personally present in court today. According to him, within a period of 3 to 4 weeks time the promotion exercise covering both the categories of petitioners vis-a-vis in Public Works Department should be complete. 6.

It may be mentioned that in our order dated 22nd July, 2021 we had directed that the promotion orders/posting orders of both categories of petitioners be simultaneously carried out and the period prescribed for completion of the exercise was six weeks from 22nd July,

2021.

7.

Though substantial progress has been made, the process is yet to reach finality.

8.

Mr. Chatterji, learned senior counsel, Mr. Desai and Mr. Deshmukh, learned counsel appearing for those categories of petitioners who are persons without disabilities and awaiting for posting orders having been duly promoted in November, 2020, submitted that delay in giving effect to their due promotion by not issuing consequential posting orders is not at all justified. They therefore pray for issuance of time bound directions by the court for issuance of their posting orders on promotion.

9.

Dr. Warunjikar, Mr. Sugandh Deshmukh and Mr. Patil learned counsel appearing for the persons with disabilities submit that if the present exercise had not been carried out by the court, the progress which have been achieved till date would not have materialized.

10. Be that as it may and without entering into merits of the rival contentions which we will deal with at the time of hearing each individual case, we direct the State of Maharashtra, more particularly in the Public Works Department to complete the promotion/posting exercise covering both categories of petitioners i.e. persons with disabilities and persons without disabilities within three weeks from today; in case of the persons without disabilities, to issue their respective posting orders as the concerned DPCs had already recommended their promotion.

11.

This exercise should also be carried out simultaneously in the Education, Irrigation as well as in the Animal Husbandry Departments within the stipulated period.

12. Stand over to 5th October, 2021."

3.

Mr. Kumbhakoni, learned Advocate General has placed before us a statement indicating status of promotion in the Public Works Department as on 07.10.2021. The status report comprises of three tables, Table-A, Table-B and Table-C. Table-A comprises of promotion from Superintending Engineer to Chief Engineer; Assistant Engineer Grade II to Sub Divisional Engineer (Civil); Civil Engineer Assistant to Junior Engineer (Civil) (20% quota) and Civil Engineer Assistant to Junior Engineer (Civil) (5% quota). Out of the total 272 posts available for such promotions, 254 persons without disabilities have been promoted across the cadres and 11 persons with disabilities have been promoted, total 265. Learned Advocate General has clarified that in respect of these 265 officers not only they have been promoted but promotion orders include postings as well.

4.

Insofar Table-B is concerned, it includes promotion from the cadre of Executive Engineer (Civil) to Superintending Engineer (Civil); Assistant Engineer Grade-II to Deputy Engineer (Degree Holder) (Electrical); and Deputy Engineer (Degree Holder) (Electrical) to Executive Engineer (Degree Holder) (Electrical). Out of the total 56 posts available for such promotion, the promotional exercise has reached final point and includes 51 officers out of whom one belongs to persons with disabilities. Learned Advocate General submits that approval of the appointing authority in all the cases is required and that would be obtained without much loss of time.

5.

Table-C comprises of promotion from Deputy Engineer (Civil) to Executive Engineer (Civil); Assistant Engineer Grade-II to Sub Divisional Engineer; Sectional Engineer to Sub Divisional Officer; Zilla Parishad Sectional Engineer (Diploma Holder) to Sub Divisional Officer; and from Zilla Parishad Sectional Engineer (Degree Holder) to Sub Divisional Engineer. Out of the total 642 posts available for such promotion, the promotional exercise has been carried out covering 636 officers which includes 24 with disabilities and 612 without disabilities. 6.

Mr. Kumbhakoni, learned Advocate General submits that in respect of these categories of officers (Table-C), select list for promotion was approved on 04.10.2021. Revenue region-wise allotment choices have been called for from the officers on 04.10.2021. Choice forms are awaited. He further submits that in respect of 141 officers who were promoted in November, 2020 without posting orders the select list had to be recast because of entry of 24 officers who are persons with disabilities. However, he submits that seniority of these 141 officers will be taken into account from the dates of their promotion from November 2020. 7.

Mr. Beni Chatterjee, learned senior counsel representing these 141 officers submits that choice forms were filed by these officers pursuant to their promotional orders in November, 2020. Therefore, no fresh choice forms from such officers are required.

8.

After some confabulation with the departmental officer who is present in Court, learned Advocate General submits that respondents will

accept the choices submitted by these 141 officers in November, 2020. 9.

Mr. Sugandh Deshmukh, learned counsel representing the persons with disabilities submits that choice forms from 24 officers having disabilities covered by Table-C should also be obtained and thereafter only the posting orders should be issued to all. He submits that if the choice forms of the 141 officers submitted in November, 2020 are only considered, this may adversely affect posting of persons with disability. 10.

After hearing the matter at some length and on due consideration, we direct that the choice forms of the 141 officers submitted in November, 2020 shall be taken into account by the respondents. Choice forms from the 24 officers with disabilities shall be obtained within seven days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order whereafter promotion with posting orders shall be issued to the 636 officers covered by Table-C within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 10.1.

Insofar the promotional exercise covered by Table-B is concerned, let the promotional and posting orders be issued within the aforesaid period of two weeks.

11.

In respect of Irrigation Department (Water Resources Department), Mr. Kumbhakoni, learned Advocate General has placed before us status report as on 06.10.2021. The status report covers promotion from Executive Engineer (Civil) to Superintending Engineer (Civil) down to Assistant Engineer Grade-II/Junior Engineer/Section Engineer to Deputy Engineer (Electric). He submits that in all promotions

have been made to 290 posts which include 274 officers without disabilities and 16 with disabilities. Not only promotion orders have been issued but posting orders of all the 290 promotee officers have also been issued.

12.

In addition to the above, process for promotion to 129 promotional posts is underway in which 123 are persons without disabilities and 6 are persons with disabilities. 13.

Let the promotional exercise in respect of these 129 officers be expedited and carried out out as early as possible. 14.

In respect of Animal Husbandry Department, learned Advocate General has submitted status report as on 05.10.2021. As per the status report, a total of 80 officers are being considered for promotion from Livestock Development Officer Grade-A to Assistant Commissioner of Animal Husbandry and from Assistant Commissioner of Animal Husbandry Group-A to Deputy Commissioner of Animal Husbandry Group-A. As pointed out, a total of 80 officers are being considered which includes 76 without disabilities and 4 with disabilities. 15.

Mr. Kumbhakoni has informed us about the various stages this process has to go through. Presently, the matter is before the General Administration Department for approval. Once the approval is obtained, choices will be invited from the concerned officers for their posting on promotion. Finally, the Civil Services Board will issue recommendations to the appointing authority for issuance of promotional and posting order. He

further submits that the end is in sight in respect of Animal Husbandry Department.

16.

Like the Irrigation Department (Water Resources Department), we also direct that in respect of Animal Husbandry Department the process be expedited and consequential promotion order/posting order be issued as early as possible. 17.

Insofar the School Education Department is concerned, learned Advocate General has placed before us a status report and submits therefrom that most of the teachers and school staff are under local bodies and not directly under the control of the State Government. It has been found that service book of such teachers and staff have not been properly maintained creating difficulties at the time of retirement leading to delay in payment of pension etc.. He further submits that Government has decided to carry out a comprehensive exercise for updating the service books of all such teaching and non-teaching staff of the schools. 18.

On a query by the Court, he submits that the process of promotion will require about two and half months time. 19.

At this stage, Mr. Sugandh Deshmukh, learned counsel submits that insofar promotions from Education Officer to Deputy Director is concerned, the problem expressed by the learned Advocate General may not have a relevance. Therefore, time bound directions may be issued by the Court.

20.

We find that there are other posts also which may not be under the local bodies, such as Joint Director of Education, Deputy Director of Education and Deputy Education Officer etc..

21.

Learned Advocate General submits that splitting up cadres for the purpose of promotion may not be a viable option as it may lead to complications and further delay. It is in the interest of teaching and nonteaching staff that before carrying out the promotion exercise their service books are updated.

22.

Having regard to the above, we direct that in respect of School Education Department, let the process of promotion be expedited and taken to its logical conclusion within the outer limit of eight weeks. 23.

No further order is called for at this stage. 24.

Stand over to 03.12.2021.

Digitally signed by BALAJI GOVINDRAO PANCHAL Date:

2021.10.11 11:08:17 +0530 BALAJI GOVINDRAO PANCHAL MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J UJJAL BHUYAN, J