Sampada Sakharam Bawalekar @ Sampada Roshan Singnath v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

907-11099-2025-CWP=.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11099 OF 2025 Sampada Sakharam Bawalekar @ Sampada Roshan Singnath ... Petitioner

Versus

Digitally signed by UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Date:

2025.09.25 10:05:49 +0530 UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents .............

Mr. Datta Pawar for the petitioners.

Ms.T.J. Kapre, AGP for the respondent - State. .............

Coram : M. S. Karnik & Sharmila U. Deshmukh, JJ.

Date : September 24, 2025.

P. C. :

1.

We have heard learned AGP. He submits that vigilance cell inquiry is completed and the petition can be allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) by granting a reasonable time.

2.

Accordingly, the respondent no.2 - Scrutiny Committee is directed to decide the application within a period of 6 weeks from today. 3.

The petition is disposed of.

[ Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. ] [ M. S. Karnik ] Uday S. Jagtap 1 of