Sudhir Madhukar Kulkarni v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2658 OF 2021 Vivek Vilas Salunkhe ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2674 OF 2021 Mayur Jakhu Jadhav ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary School Education Department & Ors. ... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2659 OF 2021 Sagar Ramkrishna Nagane ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary School Education Department & Ors. ... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2673 OF 2021 Sudhir Madhukar Kulkarni ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents

****** Mr. Rajaram Deshmukh,for the Petitioners.

Smt. P.N. Diwan, Mrs. P.J. Gavhane,Ms. K.N. Salunke and Mr. N.K. Rajpurohit, AGP, for the Respondents/State.

****** CORAM: R. D. DHANUKA AND ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.

DATE : 26th OCTOBER, 2021.

P.C. :- 1.

Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners. Leave to amend is granted. Amendment to be carried out by tomorrow. 2.

By these petitions, the petitioners are seeking writ of mandamus against the respondents to consider the proposal described in prayer clause (a) of the petition submitted by the Management for giving permanent appointment to the petitioner. 3.

Learned counsel for the Petitioners states that all the proposals described in the Petitions are pending. Statement is accepted.

4.

We direct the respondent No. 2 to consider the proposals described in prayer clause (a) of the Petitions, if the same is pending within six weeks from today.

5.

The order that would be passed shall be communicated to the Petitioners within one week from date of

passing of the order.

6.

If the proposals are adverse against the petitioners, the petitioners would be at liberty to file appropriate proceedings. No coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioners for a period of three weeks from the date of communication of the order.

7.

If the order that would be passed is in favour of the petitioners, then the Education Officer shall provide the consequential benefits including the payment due to the Petitioners within a period of six weeks from the date of grant of approval.

8.

The Writ Petitions are disposed off in the aforesaid terms.

9.

Rule is made absolute accordingly.

10.

No order as to costs.

11.

Parties to act on an authenticated copy of the order. [ABHAY AHUJA, J.] [R. D. DHANUKA, J.]