Subhash Ananda Gaikwad And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1 / 2 04-APEAL-1285-19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1285 OF 2019 Subhash Ananda Gaikwad & Anr.

.... Appellants versus State of Maharashtra & Anr.

.... Respondents .......

• Mr. Rushikesh Kale i/b. Mr. Viresh Purwant, Advocate for Appellants.

• Mr. P. H. Gaikwad, APP for the State/Respondent No.1. • Smt. Snehal Chaudhari (Appointed Advocate) for Respondent No.2.

CORAM

: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 14th NOVEMBER, 2022 P.C. :

1.

After arguing for some time, when I expressed my disinclination to grant relief, learned counsel for the Applicant prays for unconditional withdrawal of this application. 2.

Permission granted. The Appeal is allowed to be Digitally signed by MANUSHREE V NESARIKAR Date:

2022.11.14 16:49:47 +0530 MANUSHREE V NESARIKAR withdrawn unconditionally. If the Appellants surrender or are arrested and if they make an application for bail, with advance Nesarikar

2 / 2 04-APEAL-1285-19.odt notice to the State of Maharashtra and the Respondent No.2, the said bail application shall be decided at the earliest, because the Appellants were on interim relief for a long period. 3.

The bail application shall be decided in accordance with law without being influenced by the factum of withdrawal of this Appeal.

4.

With these observations, the Appeal is disposed of. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)