← Library
Bombay High CourtCAS/1621/2017

Zilla Parishad Ratnagiri (Thru) Chief Executive Officer Ratnagiri Parshad Bhavan Ratnagiri. v. Dada Yamaji Jadhav

2020-01-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre2 pages

CAS-1621-17.doc BDP-SPS Bharat D.

Pandit

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1621 OF 2017 (For stay of execution of impugned order) by Bharat D.

Pandit Date: 2020.01.18 17:32:08 +0530 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.327 OF 2018 Zilla Parishad Ratnagiri Through Chief Executive Officer and Others ...Appellants V/s Dada Yamaji Jadhav ....Respondent.

Mr. Shashank C. Mangle for Applicants.

Smt. Vijayalaxmi S. Nikam for Respondent CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE: JANUARY 14, 2020 P.C.:- 1] Upon appreciation of evidence and terms of agreement-Exhibit75, lower Appellate Court has passed money decree of which stay is sought by the Appellants.

2] In the backdrop of the fact that stay of money decree is sought by Appellants, a statutory body, it will be appropriate in my opinion to direct the Appellants to deposit entire decretal amount in this court 1/2

CAS-1621-17.doc within a period of eight weeks from today. If such amount is deposited, there shall be stay in terms of prayer clause (a). 3] Application stands allowed in the aforesaid terms. It is made clear that in case if amount is not deposited as ordered, stay shall cease to operate without further reference to the Court. ( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. ) 2/2