Tukaram Dattu Jadhav And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS
904-WP-15581-2022 Pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 15581 OF 2022 Tukaram Dattu Jadhav & Anr.
.. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
.. Respondents Mr. Dnyaneshwar Bhosale for petitioners.
Mr. B. V. Samant, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 6. Ms. Vishakha Patel h/f Mr. Vishwasrao Deokar for respondent nos. 8 to 10.
Digitally signed by PRAVIN DASHARATH PANDIT Date:
2023.02.20 10:58:13 +0530 PRAVIN DASHARATH PANDIT CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA, ACTING CJ. & SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE:
FEBRUARY 17, 2023 P.C.:
1.
We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned AGP and the learned counsel for the Zilla Parisahd. 2.
The petitioners were Muster Assistants. The petitioners it appears were dismissed from services. They filed dispute before the Industrial Court.
3.
The petitioner no.1 filed Complaint (ULP) No. 115 of 1990. Under Judgment and Order dated 2nd May, 1997 passed by the Industrial Court, Solapur, the petitioner no.1 is granted permanency from 1st October, 1988. The petitioner no.2 filed Complaint (ULP) No. 108 of 1990. Under Judgment and Order dated 31st July, 1997, the Industrial Court, Solapur granted him permanency from 1st October, 1988.
4.
In view of the judgment and order passed by this Court in the case of Ramchandra Kondiba Mahajan vs. The State of
904-WP-15581-2022 Maharashtra and Ors. in Writ Petition No. 2946 of 1997, the petitioners shall be treated as permanent employees with effect from 1st October, 1988.
As the said petitioners have superannuated, they would make representation to the authorities for grant of pension benefits. If such representation is made, the same shall be decided expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months from the date of making of representation by considering their eligibility for grant of pension. 5.
In light of that, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)