Suraj Ashokkumar Rathi v. The State Of Maharashtr And Another A

20-IA-3170-2025 (CR).DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3170 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3276 OF 2025 Suraj Ashokkumar Rathi ...Applicant

Versus

The State Of Maharashtra And Another

...Respondents

Mr. Himanshu Pujari Advocate for the Applicant Ms. Veera Shinde APP for the State

CORAM

:

SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE :

7th OCTOBER, 2025.

IRESH MASHAL P.C.

by IRESH MASHAL Date:

2025.10.09 11:19:18 +0530 1.

By this application, the applicant is seeking cancellation of bail of respondent no. 2.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that respondent no. 2 has suppressed the fact of his antecedents before this Court and obtained bail from this Court which is illegal. Hence, requested to allow the application and cancel the bail of the applicant. Learned counsel further submitted that if this Court is not inclined to allow the application, direction be given to respondent no. 2 not to enter Hatkanangale Taluka.

Iresh

20-IA-3170-2025 (CR).DOC 3.

Learned counsel for respondent no. 2 submits that respondent no. 2 will not enter Hatkanangale Taluka till framing of the charge.

4.

Learned APP submits that appropriate orders be passed. 5.

I have heard all the learned counsel. Considering the submissions of all the learned counsels as well as this Court has passed a well reasoned order and no interference is required in it, I pass following order.

O R D E R

(I) The Application is rejected.

(II) The Respondent No. 2 shall not enter in Hatkanangale Taluka till framing of the charge. 6.

The Application is disposed of in above terms. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Iresh