← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/2348/2025disposed off

Shubham Krushnat Deshmukh v. The State Of Maharashtra

2025-11-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige2 pages

501-ABA-2348-2025 (CR) (STM).DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2348 OF 2025 Shubham Krushnat Deshmukh ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3545 OF 2025 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2348 OF 2025 Sakshi D. Sabale & Ors.

...Applicants/Intervenors

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :

Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date:

2025.12.03 19:12:09 +0530 Shubham Krushnat Deshmukh ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 18346 OF 2025 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2348 OF 2025 Bharti Bharat Gharkar ...Applicant/Intervenor

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :

Shubham Krushnat Deshmukh ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

.....

Mr. Nikhil N. Pawar, Advocate for the Applicants/Intervenors in Interim Application No.3545/2025.

Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for the Respondent - State. .....

Shantanu S. Dhudum

501-ABA-2348-2025 (CR) (STM).DOC

CORAM

:

SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE :

28th NOVEMBER 2025 P.C.

1.

Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on production board. 2.

The praecipe is moved by the learned counsel for the Intervenors in IA/3545/2025 for speaking to the minutes of order dated 28th November, 2025.

3.

In the said order, paragraph No.5 be replaced as under: "Learned counsel Mr. Nikhil Pawar for one of the intervenors submits that he had given the amount to the complainant for processing fees of loan."

4.

In view of above, the said order is corrected accordingly and corrected order be uploaded on the official website. 5.

Rest of the order remains as it is.

6.

In view of above, the praecipe stands disposed off. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum