Ratnadip Balaso Gaikwad And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 /2 19-appa-1369-16 Nalawade FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1369 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.712 OF 2016 Ratnadip Balaso Gaikwad and anr.

vs.

State of Maharashtra and anr.

Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. Pratap Patil for the Applicant.

Smt. Anamika Malhotra, APP for the Respondent­State. Smt. T.M. Khamkar for Respondent No.2.

CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J.

DATE : 26th April, 2018 P.C.

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel appointed to represent the respondent No.2.

2.

Mr. Patil fairly submitted that as of today prayer clause(a) does not survive and has become infractuous. He further submitted that in view of Section 357(2) of the Cr.P.C. the prayer clause (b) also does not survive. Application is disposed off as infractuous.

(A.S.GADKARI, J.)

2 /2 19-appa-1369-16