Satish Tukaram Kharve v. The State Of Maharashtra

1/2 16 wp 5317.19.docx

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5317 OF 2019 Satish Tukaram Kharve ...

Petitioner v/s.

The State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent None for the petitioner.

Mr A.R. Kapadnis, APP for the State.

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE & R.N.LADDHA, JJ.

Digitally signed by LATA SUNIL PANJWANI Date:

2023.01.21 11:21:34 +0530 DATE : 20th January 2023 LATA SUNIL PANJWANI P.C. :

Heard Mr Kapadnis, the learned APP. None appears for the petitioner.

2.

On instructions from the investigating officer, learned APP states that the petitioners have already moved before the Court below seeking discharge as the charge sheet in the matter is already submitted. 3.

According to him, the prayer in the petition is for quashing of the FIR and not the charge sheet.

2/2 16 wp 5317.19.docx 4.

In view of the aforesaid development, nothing survives in the petition. The petition stands disposed of.

5.

The petitioners are at liberty to pursue their application for discharge in accordance with law.

R.N. LADDHA, J.

NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

Lata Panjwani, P.S.