Shree Swami Samarth Bahuudeshiy Sanstha, Vairag, Thru President Prakash R Kharatmol v. State Of Maharashtra Thru The Social Justice And Special Assistance Dept. Thru Secretary, And ORS
KVM 1/2 25 - WP 3840 OF 2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date: 2021.12.01 15:42:36 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 3840 OF 2019 Shree Swami Samarth Bhauudeshiy Sanstha, Vairag, Thru. President, Prakash R.Kharatmol ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..... Respondents Mr.Rajaram Deshmukh for the Petitioner.
Mr.N.K.Rajpurohit, A.G.P. for the State.
CORAM: R. D. DHANUKA AND ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
DATE : 30th NOVEMBER, 2021 P.C:- The matter was argued for sometime. Mr.Deshmukh, learned counsel for the petitioner states that though his client had submitted a proposal for entitlement of the petitioner Residential School for Special Children for grant in aid on the similar conditions mentioned in G.R. dated 8th April, 2015 earlier, his client would file a fresh proposal/representation with the respondent no.1 updating the requirement of the petitioner and by relying upon the resolution dated 8th April, 2015 and subsequent resolution applicable to such entitlement in respect of such grant in aid. Such representation would
KVM 2/2 25 - WP 3840 OF 2019.doc be filed by the petitioner within four weeks from today. Upon receipt of such representation/proposal from the petitioner, the respondent no.1 shall pass appropriate order on the said proposal after considering the factual aspect and the entitlement of the petitioner based on any Government Resolution within eight weeks thereafter. The order that would be passed by the respondent no.1 shall be communicated to the petitioner within one week from the date of passing of such order. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner would be at liberty to file appropriate proceedings. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any views on the merits of the matter. All contentions of both the parties are kept open. 2.
Writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No order as to costs.
3.
The parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order. [ABHAY AHUJA, J.] [R.D.DHANUKA, J.]