Shriraj Ashokkumar Birajdar v. Shruti Shriraj Birajdar

11-MCA516-2022.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 516 OF 2022 Shriraj Ashokkumar Birajdar ...Applicant

Versus

Shruti Shriraj Birajdar

...Respondent

Mr. Akshay Kulkarni, for the Applicant.

Mr. Abhijit Kulkarni, a/w Chinmay Patil and Prasad Bade, for the Respondent.

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2025.05.13 15:10:21 +0530

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED:

9th MAY, 2025 PC:- 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

The learned Counsel for the parties make a joint statement that the parties have amicably resolved the dispute and Consent Terms have been executed.

3.

The learned Counsel for the parties seek leave to tender the Consent Terms.

Leave granted.

4.

The applicant and respondent are present before the Court. They admit the contents of the Consent Terms and execution thereof. The applicant and respondent are identified by their respective Counsels.

1/2

11-MCA516-2022.DOC 5.

Upon being inquired, the applicant and respondent submit that they have read and understood the contents of the Consent Terms and agree to abide by the same. 6.

The Consent Terms are, thus, taken on record and marked 'X'.

7.

The application stands disposed in accordance with the Consent Terms ('X').

8.

The undertakings given in the Consent Terms ('X') are accepted as undertakings to the Court.

9.

All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2