Devidas Parsu Naik v. State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary, Rural Devlp. And Water Conservation Dept. And ANR.
ssm 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 204 OF 2015 Kalpanabai Prakash Pawar ....Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
....Respondents.
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 303 OF 2015 Baliram Mahadu Bothinge ....Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
....Respondents.
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 304 OF 2015 Chandji Sitaram Barage ....Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
....Respondents.
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 305 OF 2015 Balaji Babusha Khupse ....Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
....Respondents.
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 306 OF 2015 Devidas Parsu Naik ....Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
....Respondents.
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 307 OF 2015 Balu Namdeo Gavari ....Petitioner.
Vs.
1/3
ssm 2 State of Maharashtra & Ors.
....Respondents.
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 308 OF 2015 Vitthal Bhaurao Pimple ....Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
....Respondents.
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 309 OF 2015 Rajendra Bhilsing Valvi ....Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
....Respondents.
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 437 OF 2015 Ganesh Prakash Pardhi ....Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
....Respondents.
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 438 OF 2015 Sampat Ananda Vasave ....Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
....Respondents.
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 439 OF 2015 Pundlik Kisan Deshmukh ....Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
....Respondents.
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 440 OF 2015 Sambhaji Suraji Vasave ....Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
....Respondents.
2/3
ssm 3 Mr. Ashwin R. Kapadnis for the Petitioner in all the matters. Ms. M.S. Bane, AGP for the Respondent No.1 in all the matters. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND C.V. BHADANG, JJ.
DATE : 21st JANUARY 2015.
P.C.: Heard.
The only prayer made by the Petitioner is for a direction to the RespondentZilla Parishad to decide the proposal of the Petitioner for transfer, in accordance with the Government Resolution dated 29.09.2011, from the Scheduled Tribe category within a time frame. Since, the prayer of the Petitioners is innocuous and since similar prayers were considered and granted by this Court in Writ Petition No. 3359 of 2014, we intend to grant the prayer made by the Petitioners. Hence, the Petitions are disposed of with a direction to the Respondent No.2Zilla Parishad to consider and decide the proposal of the Petitioners in terms of the Government Resolution dated 29.09.2011 from the Scheduled Tribe category, as early as possible and positively within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Order accordingly. No order as to costs.
(C.V. BHADANG, J.) (VASANTI A. NAIK, J.) 3/3