Akash Ramchandra Mulik v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1/2 Yadav 36.aba.2317.18 aw Appp.1417.18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2317 OF 2018 Avinash Sayaji Kadam ...

Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1417 OF 2018 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2317 OF 2018 Akash Ramchandra Mulik ...

Intervener

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :

Avinash Sayaji Kadam ...

Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent Mr. Pravin B. Gole h/f Pradeep M. Patil for Applicant. Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for Respondent - State.

CORAM :

NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE :

FEBRUARY 14, 2019.

P.C. :

.

The learned Counsel for Applicant submits that as the Applicant is arrested, the present Application has rendered infructuous.

2/2 Yadav 36.aba.2317.18 aw Appp.1417.18 2.

As such, the Anticipatory Bail Application stands disposed of, as infructuous.

3.

Since the Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of, Criminal Application No. 1417 of 2018 does not survive. Hence, the same stands disposed of accordingly.

(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)