Rohidas Uttreshwar Satav v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Rajeshri Aher 1/1 9 apeal 1693 of 2019.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1693 OF 2019 Rihidas U. Satav .. Appellant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

.. Respondents ......

Mr.Jaydeep D. Mane a/w. Divyashree Shanbhag, Advocate for the Appellant.

Ms.M.R. Tidke, APP for the Respondent No.1-State. ......

CORAM :

SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATED :

DECEMBER 01, 2022.

P.C. :

The learned counsel for the Appellant states that the Appellant was arrested and granted regular bail. Therefore, nothing survives in this Appeal, which essentially is for anticipatory bail. Digitally signed by RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER Date:

2022.12.02 15:01:58 +0530 RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER Considering the statement and the prayer for withdrawal of this Appeal, permission is granted to withdrawn this Appeal. Appeal is disposed of, as withdrawn.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)