Shobha Vitthal Vhanmane v. Abusaheb Dattu Mashale

18-IA-498-2019.doc Arjun

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.498 OF 2019 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.25737 OF 2019 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.499 OF 2019 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.25737 OF 2019 Shobha Vitthal Vhanmane ...Applicant/ Appellant Digitally signed by ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Date:

2022.12.08 18:36:11 +0530 ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR V/s.

Abusaheb Dattu Mashale

...Respondent

Mr. Ramdas H. Patil, for the Applicant..

Mr. Prashant S. Hagare, for the Respondent.

CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATE : 7th DECEMBER, 2022 P.C.:

1.

The Interim Application No. 498 of 2019 is filed for to condone the delay in filing the Second Appeal. There is delay of about 56 days.

2.

Mr. Prashant S. Hagare, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent strongly opposed the Interim Application.

18-IA-498-2019.doc The reasons for delay are adequately explained in the delay condonation Application.

3.

For the reasons set out in the delay condonation Application the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 4.

The Interim Application is disposed of with no order as to costs.

(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)