S. Panneerselvam v. A Kuppusamy

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.04.2019 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.SUNDRESH and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.SARAVANAN A.S.No.162 of 2013 1.S.Panneelselvam 2.Minor Mathiarasan 3.Minor Pasupathi (Minors 2 and 3 are rep. by their brother Guardian S.Panneerselvam) ..

Appellants Vs 1.A.Kuppusamy 2.A.Subramani 3.Pushpalatha ..

Respondents Appeal preferred under Section 96 C.P.C. r/w Order 41 Rule 1 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree dated 28.09.2012 in O.S.No.145 of 2011 passed by the Principal District Judge, Salem. For Appellants ..

Dr.P.Jagadeesan For Respondents ..

Ms.P.Veena Suresh

JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.) Learned counsel appearing for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the appeal and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the appellants, the appeal suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

-sd/- Assistant Registrar / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar mmi To The Principal District Judge, Salem.

Copy to The section officer, VR Section, High court,Maadras A.S.No.162 of 2013 sai(co) RD 08/06/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/