← Library
Madras High CourtCMP/808/2024ordered

Sarathkumar v. Poomalai

2024-06-12Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh2 pages

CMP No.808 of 2024 in CMA SR No.82 of 2024 N.ANAND VENKATESH.,J Notice to the 1st respondent is dispensed with, since he remined exparte before the Tribunal. Notice has been served on the 2nd respondent. Mrs.R.Sreevidhya, learned Standing counsel, takes notice on behalf of 2nd respondent.

2.

This Civil Miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 182 days in preferring the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. 3.

Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and perused the records.

4.

Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the miscellaneous petition is allowed and the delay of 182 days is condoned.

5.

Registry is directed to number the main Civil miscellaneous appeal and list the same for admission. When the matter is posted for admission, the name of learned counsel for 2nd respondent shall be printed in the cause-list.

6.

It is made clear that for the period of delay of 182 days, the appellant will not be entitled for any interest if in the event of this Court enhancing the amount of compensation fixed by the Tribunal. 12.06.2024 rka https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

N.ANAND VENKATESH.,J rka CMP No.808 of 2024 in CMA SR No.82 of 2024 12.06.2024 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2