R.Inbaraj v. Sethu Subramanian

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29-01-2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM A.S.No.1022 of 2012 R.Inbaraj .. Appellant/Plaintiff vs.

1.Mr.Sethu Subramanian 2.Mr.Ganesan Alias Ganesh .. Respondents/Defendants Appeal Suit is preferred under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree dated 29.03.2012 passed in O.S.No.8718 of 2010 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.III, Chennai.

For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.C.S.Kiran

J U D G M E N T

The matter was listed for hearing on 20.12.2019, none appeared for the appellant on that day and the appeal suit was listed under the caption 'For Dismissal' on 02.01.2020. When the matter was taken up on 03.01.2020, again none appeared on behalf of the appellant. Thus, this Court directed the Registry to list the matter under the caption 'For Dismissal' on 07.01.2020. When the matter was taken up on 07.01.2020, a request was made by the learned counsel for the appellant to grant two weeks adjournment. Accordingly, the appeal suit was adjourned.

2. The matter was listed on 27.01.2020, none appeared for the appellant and once again it was posted under the caption 'For Dismissal' on 29.01.2020. When the matter is taken up today i.e., 29.01.2020, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Thus, it is to be construed that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Accordingly, the present appeal suit stands dismissed for non-prosecution. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS V) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar Svn To The Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.III, Chennai.

Copy to The Section officer VR Section High Court, Madras 104.

A.S.No.1022 of 2012 VBA(CO) SP(21/02/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/