Marimuthu v. Sundari Ammal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 18.06.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN S.A.No.1182 of 1992 and C.M.P.No.587 of 2007 1.Marimuthu(died) 2.Venkatachalam 3.Banumathi 4.Minor Ramesh (rep.by mother-Banumathi) (Appellants 3,4 are brought on record as legal representatives of the deceased 1st appellant and 3rd appellant is appointed as guardian of the 4th appellant vide order of Court dated 06.02.07 made in C.M.P.No.195196/07) ..

Appellants ...Versus...

1.Sundari Ammal 2.Pachamuthu 3.Sellammal 4.Ayyammal ..

Respondents PRAYER:This Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.7 of 1991 dated 30.07.1991 on the file of the Principal District Judge,Salem reversing the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.951 of 1984 dated 21.12.1989 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Salem.

For Appellants ::

No appearance For R1 ::

Mr.T.Mathi For R2 to R4 ::

No appearance

J U D G M E N T

When the Second Appeal came up for hearing on 17.06.2019, the learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that they have no instructions from the client. Hence, the case was posted 'for orders' today (i.e.,18.06.2019).

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the appellants either-in-person or through their counsel. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Principal District Judge, Salem.

2.The Principal District Munsif, Salem.

Copy to The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

S.A.No.1182 of 1992and C.M.P.No.587 of 2007 ppa[co] srg 22/07/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/