← Library
Madras High CourtWP/10088/2015settled before the lokadalats

K.L.Mohan Reddy, v. The District Collector,

2019-01-03Honourable Mr.Justice K.Gnanaprakasam (Retd.)3 pages

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI Lok Adalat-II organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee Thursday, the 03rd day of January 2019 LOK ADALAT AWARD (Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987) Presided over by The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE K.GNANAPRAKASAM (Retd.) and Members Mr.A.Selvadoss Mrs.S.S.Jothivani W.P.No.10088 of 2015 and M.P.No.2 of 2015 Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 2nd respondent in E4/130/2015 dated 12.03.2015 and quash the same and consequently direct the third respondent to dispose of the set aside petition filed by the petitioner in month of November 2014 and decide the same on merits.

K.L.Mohan Reddy .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector, Chennai District, Singaravelar Maligai, 1st Lane Beach, Chennai - 600 001.

2. The Tahsildar, Aminjikarai Taluk, Chennai - 600 107.

3. The Deputy Commissioner of Labour II, 2nd Floor, DMS Compound, Teynampet, Chennai- 6

4. Chinnapappa

5. Elumalai

6. Bhuvaneswari .. Respondents This case came up for settlement before the Lok Adalat. Both the parties are present. Mrs.R.Aparna, counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Ravi, counsel appearing for the respondents 4 to 6 are present. After mutual discussion, negotiation, mediation and conciliation between both parties, they arrived at a compromise to settle the matter as follows:- TERMS OF SETTLEMENT Petitioner, respondents 4 to 6 and their respective advocates are present.

2. Petitioner and respondents 4 to 6 have compromised the matter and the terms of compromise is endorsed on the writ petition itself and the same is duly signed by both the parties and their respective advocates. The said compromise is accepted, which reads as follows:- " After filing of the writ petition, the writ petitioner has deposited before the Deputy Labour Commissioner II, the balance award amount with accrued interest through Demand Draft bearing No.065022 dated 13.04.2015 drawn on Karur Vysya Bank for a sum of Rs.4,09,417/- as per the award dated 09.12.2013 passed by the Deputy Labour Commissioner II, Chennai. Now the writ petitioner and respondents 4 to 6 have compromised the matter thereby the petitioner is withdrawing the writ petition and he has no objection to withdraw the amount deposited by him by the 4 to 6 respondents before the Deputy Labour Commissioner II Chennai together with accrued interest of the amount thus deposited.

In view of the same, award may be passed accordingly.

3. In view of the aforesaid compromise and endorsement made by them, the award is passed accordingly. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

4. The full Court fee paid shall be refunded to the petitioner in the manner provided under Section 69-A of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 and the

Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994 and there shall be no demand for additional Court fee.

sd/- sd/- K.L.Mohan Reddy Counsel for the Petitioner

4. Chinnapappa

5. Elumalai sd/-

6. Bhuvaneswari Counsel for the Respondents 4 to 6 sd/- Judge sd/- sd/- Member Member s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To:The parties/Advocate concerned Copy to:

1. The District Collector, Chennai District, Singaravelar Maligai, 1st Lane Beach, Chennai - 600 001.

2. The Tahsildar, Aminjikarai Taluk, Chennai - 600 107.

3. The Deputy Commissioner of Labour II, 2nd Floor, DMS Compound, Teynampet, Chennai- 6 4.The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai. 5.The Section Officer,Writ Section, High Court, Madras. 6.The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court, Madras.+2 copies W.P.No.10088 of 2015 and M.P.No.2 of 2015 SKV(CO) SP(07/02/2019)