Madras High CourtAS/22/2011dismissed as settled out of court

C.Rajendran v. Rajathi

2021-09-23Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. Asha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23.09.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA A.S.No.22 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 1.C.Rajendran 2.C.Gajendran 3.Rajammal 4.Bakkiam 5.Sumathi ...appellants/Plaintiff Vs 1.Rajathi 2.A.Jagadeesan 3.T.Govindasamy ...Respondents/Respondents PRAYER Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.30 of 2009 dated 28.07.2010 on the file of the I Additional District Court, Salem.

For appellants : Mr.B.Vijay For respondents: Mr.M.S.Vadivel Murugan for R1 to R3

JUDGMENT

Mr.M.S.Vadivel Murugan, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the parties have settled the dispute among themselves. The learned counsel for the appellants is unable to confirm the same since his counter part in the trial Court is not able to contact the client.

2.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the respondents, the first appeal is dismissed as 'settled out of Court'. No further orders to cost. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vkr To The I Additional District Judge, The I Additional District Court, Salem.

Copy To The Section Officer, V R Section High Court Madras - 104.

+1cc to Mr.S.Vadivel Murugan, Advocate, S.R.No.49374 A.S.No.22 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 SRA(CO) RGA(13/10/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/